Bagless vacuum clearners… Why?

This entry was posted in Upright Vacuum Cleaners and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

25 Comments

  1. BubbaClemx66
    Posted February 8, 2012 at 4:56 pm | Permalink

    we have solved this problem, but created another.problem. the rainbow vacuum has been out for decades. it has no bag, it uses water. 100% of the dirt gets trapped in the water. when done, depending on how much dirt and what kind of dirt you have, you can flush it, or dump it outside. the problem with this is the price. from new to used, a working rainbow will run from $600 to close to $3000. there is no reason for all that greed, it should sell new for about the same as a Dyson.

  2. voon100
    Posted February 8, 2012 at 5:17 pm | Permalink

    Write to Sir James Dyson, he’s the one who invented the bagless vacuum cleaner and now license his patents too all the vacuum cleaner brands.

  3. rpeek
    Posted February 8, 2012 at 5:46 pm | Permalink

    @harryfaber Yea, I set the filter on fire on my shop vac, cleaning out the pellet stove. Man those things can make a lot of smoke! hahaha. My step son blew one up sucking out a cylinder hole on a 350 Chevy. Guess he sucked some gas through the motor. Nice explosion…

  4. harryfaber
    Posted February 8, 2012 at 6:14 pm | Permalink

    I’d have thought you would have made your own! A mate of mine got in all sorts of trouble after using his wife’s cleaner to suck clean the smoke box on a miniature steam locomotive, apparently, cinders that are still burning will kill most cleaners, so he made his own out of an old compressor receiver.

  5. majorlybad
    Posted February 8, 2012 at 6:16 pm | Permalink

    I’ve had a Dyson for 7 years. Works like a dream and I empty it into the outside bin, therefore no dust or dirt in the house and no buying bags just to throw away. I’d never go back to bagged.

  6. rpeek
    Posted February 8, 2012 at 6:38 pm | Permalink

    @panaclean775 Well, my wife picked it out. Of course, what would I know about a vacuum cleaner. If it’s not a shop vac, I don’t have a clue. It’s a “progressive” and it says “hepa” on it. 

  7. panaclean775
    Posted February 8, 2012 at 7:06 pm | Permalink

    @rpeek Kenmores are great.Hopefully its the Intuition.That is a fantastic machine.Panasonic made with the best motors in the industry.

  8. rpeek
    Posted February 8, 2012 at 7:41 pm | Permalink

    @panaclean775  No the red Dirt Devil is the other old vacuum. We’ll replace it too, eventually. haha. Yea, we got a Kenmore..

  9. panaclean775
    Posted February 8, 2012 at 8:33 pm | Permalink

    @rpeek Oh ok.I thought the new one was the red Dirt Devil in the video.Sorry.Hopefully you got a Kenmore then.They are very good vacs.

  10. rpeek
    Posted February 8, 2012 at 8:47 pm | Permalink

    @panaclean775 No actually I wasn’t joking.. We do feel good about the new vac. Didn’t get a dirt devil, but got a good one at sears… Trish loves it.. hahaha.

  11. panaclean775
    Posted February 8, 2012 at 8:52 pm | Permalink

    @rpeek I’m sorry.I didnt mean to make you feel bad about your new Dirt Devil..Haha!! Some of them are really good machines as far as cleaning power like the Dyson but..It still is a bagless vacuum thats dirty to empty.No mater what you do your gonna get dirt on you somewhere..I absolutely loved you video!!! You are very funny..Loved the bandjo music in the background:)

  12. rpeek
    Posted February 8, 2012 at 9:49 pm | Permalink

    @panaclean775 You’re making me feel so much better about our new vac!  hahaha

  13. panaclean775
    Posted February 8, 2012 at 10:35 pm | Permalink

    @farmall1938 Lol!! Nothing like having a nice clean synthetic cloth hepa bag in your vacuum.Keeps all the dirt in the bag and easy to change out.Plus it doesnt loose power very much because the synthetic cloth breats very easy as it is filled with dirt..Gotta love the Kirby’s!!

  14. panaclean775
    Posted February 8, 2012 at 11:31 pm | Permalink

    Bagged vacuums of today are not like yesterdays.Todays bagged vacuums use the new synthetic cloth hepa bags.They are vastly superior to the old paper bags.They dont clog up because they have multy layers.. as the bag fills it still breaths normal.No loss of power..They keep the inside of you vacuum spotless and keep the motor clean to last longer.9 out of 10 doctors recommend hepa bagged vacs over baggless.Easiy to change..No touching the dirt..No loss of power.Its a simple choice.

  15. panaclean775
    Posted February 8, 2012 at 11:39 pm | Permalink

    @walkingfreak Nah.most of the newer vacs use the superior clean synthetic hepa bags that are recycleable..The Hepa bagged vac of today has hardly no loss of power.Filters better that any bagless and is way more sanitary when changing.The material is recycled so its a wash out anyway and its recommended by 9 out of 10 doctors to use the hepa bagged over the bagless.Much healthier.

  16. Seattlecarnut
    Posted February 9, 2012 at 12:08 am | Permalink

    I agree with you there. That’s why I still like vaccuum cleaners with bags.

  17. rpeek
    Posted February 9, 2012 at 12:39 am | Permalink

    @blazerlover25 Dang! Dang! Dang!

  18. blazerlover25
    Posted February 9, 2012 at 1:08 am | Permalink

    ahh i remember those days of the bagged vaccums and also how much i hated having to empty one cause the unzipping was fine but figuring out how to get the bag out was a confuzzling thing for me then get dust all over me and here i find out the newer ones toss dust on ya too well dangit dangit dangit cant win with either one sounds like it haha

  19. rpeek
    Posted February 9, 2012 at 1:25 am | Permalink

    @bluedanbob I had a few people say that eliminating bags saves trees, but trees are a renewable resource, and they provide jobs for the people that grow them, the people that harvest them, and the people that make products (like vacuum cleaner bags) from them, then we grow more, instead of paving over where they used to be. I say bring back bags!.. hahaha.

  20. bluedanbob
    Posted February 9, 2012 at 1:40 am | Permalink

    @rpeek Seems like a fair assumption. I’m not sure though, all I know is he ‘disliked’ this video.

  21. zzzdogutube
    Posted February 9, 2012 at 1:52 am | Permalink

    Wait until the dust turns to dirt then sweep it with a broom. No need for bagless Vacuum..

  22. rpeek
    Posted February 9, 2012 at 2:05 am | Permalink

    @walkingfreak Which means less jobs for Americans.  Trees are a renewable resource. If we don’t have a use for the trees we’ll cut ‘em all down so we can pave over where the used to be and park all the cars the Chinese can ship over here, that are made out of the stuff we used to make….

  23. rpeek
    Posted February 9, 2012 at 2:36 am | Permalink

    @bluedanbob Is that Pig Pen from Charlie Brown?

  24. bluedanbob
    Posted February 9, 2012 at 2:51 am | Permalink

    One person so far likes dumping the tubular thing into the cylindrical garbage can and getting dust in their face.

  25. CtwoHfive0H
    Posted February 9, 2012 at 2:56 am | Permalink

    I agree, I was thinking the same thing not too long ago when I got a new vacuum.
    I think todays vacuums are designed to make you go “Ooo, Ahh” while staring at it on a shelf in a department store rather than actually working worth a damn.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Powered by Yahoo! Answers